Blowout Insurance: Do We Need This?
Posted by Alex Dalenberg in Uncategorized on 08-25-11 2 Comments
ut of an arena after a 30-point blowout feeling like you’ve been ripped off, then I’ve got a startup for you.
Seriously.
Ticket Perfection sells “ticket insurance” to protect consumers against the scourge of lopsided games by providing refunds to customers if their game is decided by more than a certain number of points.
Here’s how it works. Purchasers can insure their tickets for up to 100 percent of their original purchase by paying 10 percent of the value they’d like to insure. Let’s say you purchase a $100 ticket, but you want to get all your money back in case your team gets utterly embarrassed. For $10 you can insure the entire value of the ticket.
Of course, if it’s what Ticket Perfection defines as a good game, then you’re out $10. Where oh where to begin?
For one thing, money-wise this makes no sense. The Ticket Perfection blowout standard is pretty steep. More than 23 points for NBA and NFL game, 8 runs for Major League Baseball, and more than 3 goals for the NHL and Major League Soccer. If you’re going to a lot of games, buying insurance for each game is probably to far exceed whatever you’re getting back, which to me means its worth it just to eat the cost for crappy games, you know, like sports fans have done since their were turnstiles. For single game tickets, they’re expensive enough as it is, why tack on an extra $10 or $20 for something that isn’t a sure thing.
Ticket insurance isn’t actually a new phenomenon. Ticket Master offers its own insurance plans in case you get sick or otherwise miss your event. That’s not crazy, especially for big ticket items or people whose schedules can change from minute-to-minute.
But, for a sports startup, Ticket Perfection seems to be missing some important facets of the whole sports thing. First you’ve got to agree with Ticket Perfection when they say “We believe that the quality of any sporting event is determined by the whether or not the score is close.”
I’d say that depends on who’s getting blown out. If you hate the Yankees, you’re probably inclined to believe that the quality of any sporting event is determined by how many runs the Yankees lose by.
Also, there’s something inherently entertaining in the act of sport. Blake Griffin plays for the friggin’ L.A. Clippers. No doubt he’s made a few ridiculous jams in some hopeless games.
Or, if you’d like a more historical analogy. Let’s consider March 2, 1962. The Philadelphia Warriors blow out the New York Knicks 169-147. That’s not quite the 23-point threshold but it’s still a blowout. Also, Wilt Chamberlain scored 100 points.
What a rip off.
Like this post? You may also like these:
- Stop Getting Ripped Off By Scalpers
- Ticket Exchange Makes Hot Market Online
- The Sports Tech Nihilist: NFL Sunday Ticket Screams, ‘Show Me The Money!’
- Watching Some Tennis, Chinese Style
- The Sky Is Still Falling! DirecTV Poised To Offer Discount On Sunday Ticket
2 Comments on “Blowout Insurance: Do We Need This?”
Leave a Comment
WEEKLY PODCASTS
New podcasts available every Wednesday!
![]()
Subscribe via iTunes
![]()
TSC is now on Stitcher!
Listen on your iPhone, Android, and BlackBerry
Episode 73: The TSC Zombies Live!
We celebrate our final show at Hothead Studios by breaking down sports video games from E3; talkin’ through some dang sports video baseball cards and then go getting into the fallout from Derek Boogarrd’s untimely death. Finally, what we have all been waiting for: Dan on latest on with Posada’s crazy, tweeting wife. Share this [...]
Episode 72: Dan’s Cool Rugby Shirt
Blum breaks down 42 miles on a bike with no chain. Evans reports on the Oprah/Nike summit. Dan’s got a rugby johns he would like to share. And some high tech tricks to baseball scouting. (26.8 KB, 27.10 Minutes) Share this post:ShareEmailPrintStumbleUponRedditDigg
Episode 71: The NFL For President!
Dan breaks down the body blow online poker just took from regulators. Blum talks up the new book about what the NFL has to teach capitalism. Seth hates yet another video game. And finally ESPN on your iPad. (25.3 mb, 25.4 minutes) Share this post:ShareEmailPrintStumbleUponRedditDigg
Episode 70: “Are You Ready to Rumble?”
MLB TV’s online service is legitimately cool. The Masters will be a non-event online. Tiger Woods plays with crappy equipment and Blum compares betting on Wrestlemania to trading corn futures. Share this post:ShareEmailPrintStumbleUponRedditDigg
Episode 69: “A Podcast Unlike Any Other”
The organizers of the 2022 World Cup in Qatar seek to bend nature to their will with artificial clouds. Blum gloats over the NCAA Selection Committee’s epic seeding failures. Blackberry “Super” Apps underwhelm and Dan takes a crack at the new Masters video game. Share this post:ShareEmailPrintStumbleUponRedditDigg
Episode 68: “Revenge of the Nerds”
Seth and Blum mix it up with MIT over sports data. Dan reviews EA’s Fight Night Champion (virtual boxing is better than the real thing). Amar’e Stoudemire’s goggles get explained and the guys tour some physical fitness web sites. All that, plus, the week in review. Share this post:ShareEmailPrintStumbleUponRedditDigg
Episode 67: “Follow the Bouncing Blum”
Dan’s on the injured reserve this week, so Blum’s flying solo (with an assist from Seth the Tech Nihilist). In this episode: Seth breaks down March Madness On Demand, Blum wonders what gives with the crap-tastic apps that are dominating college athletics, a look into the NFL’s financial picture, plus the week in review at [...]
Episode 66: “It’s Hockey Night Tonight!”
It’s all hockey all the time for this week’s episode. Dan and Blum look at the cross-border battle between the Winter Classic and Heritage Classic as well as the Buffalo Sabres ownership change. Dan and Seth the Tech Nihilist reminisce about the classic NHL video games. Plus, how did a trade between the Stars and [...]
Episode 65: “Take This Job and Shove It”
Blum pitches his wild-eyed plan for NFL players to use social media to circumvent ownership. Seth the Tech-Nihilist gives his report on the new MLB.Com. Dan reviews NHL ’11 (it’s awesome) and digs into some racing tech at Daytona. Share this post:ShareEmailPrintStumbleUponRedditDigg
Episode 64: “Jets Fans are Damaged Individuals”
As Blum gloats, Dan lets the Jets know they can go straight to hell. Also, the best televisions for your Super Bowl party; Dan discovers Broadcast HD; Blum shares his illicit passion for wooden baseball bats; PLUS, the best sports e-books for your e-reader. Share this post:ShareEmailPrintStumbleUponRedditDigg



I am the marketing director at TicketPerfection, and I would like to respond to some blatant and poorly researched inaccuracies in this article.
The author says that money wise using our service makes no sense because insuring a lot of games is going to FAR exceed whatever the customer might get back. This is not at all accurate.
Let’s take a look at last year’s NFL season and assume 32 fans (one for each team) insure 100% of a $100 ticket for every game. The total insurance price for each fan would be ($10 X 16) or $160 for the season (slightly more if the team makes the playoffs and plays more than 16 games). Here is a breakdown of what each fan would have by seasons end starting with -$160 (the price they paid for the insurance):
Dolphins +40
Cardinals +340
Falcons +30
Ravens -60
Bills +240
Panthers +140
Chiefs -60
Bears +60
Bengals -160
Browns -60
Cowboys -60
Broncos +40
Lions -60
Packers +300
Texans -60
Colts -70
Jaguars +140
Vikings +140
Patriots +330
Giants +240
Jets +110
Raiders +240
Eagles +30
Steelers +210
49ers +140
Seahawks +120
Rams -60
Buccaneers +40
Titans +40
Redskins +40
Chargers +240
9 out of the 32 fans ended up lost some money. Only one out of 32 fans lost their entire $160 investment. 21 out of 32 fans made money on their investment and some of them a signficant amount. 8 fans made over %100 on their investment and Cardinals fans made over 200%.
The author goes on to say that we are missing important facets of the whole sports thing by believing that the quality of a game is affected by the closeness of the contest. Obviously this is a matter of opinion, but I don’t think we are missing the boat by believing a close game is a more valuable experience than a landslide. Just like the author, I dislike the Yankees. Even though I dislike them, I would not get much entertainment attending a game in which they lost 14-0. The author claims that to him this would actually be a better experience than attending a game in which the Yankees lost 6-4.
The author closes with two anecdotes in an attempt to prove that a game with a lopsided outcome can still be great experience. Our company does not necessarily disagree with this. If you happen to use our service and see Blake Griffin do a circus dunk or see a player score 100 points in a lopsided game, then not only have you seen a great feat but you’ve attended the game for free.
09-01-11 » 11:01 pm »
Ticket Perfection Strikes Back | The Sports Circuit
[...] first impression: not a service I think I would use. More to the point, I called it a [...]
09-14-11 » 1:20 pm »